IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
Madan Singh - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh - Respondent
Cr. Revision No. 82 of 2008
Decided On : 20-5-2016
Assault - Public Servant - Section 332 IPC - 353, 332 read with Section 34 IPC
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the assault of a public servant, Milkhi Ram, by the accused Madan Singh and others while he was discharging his official duties. The accused demanded tools from the complainant, beat him, and threatened him, resulting in injuries to the complainant. The trial court convicted the accused under Section 332 IPC, which was upheld by the appellate court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution had successfully established that the accused were guilty of the offence under Section 332 IPC. The testimony of the prosecution witnesses was deemed reliable and trustworthy, and the medical evidence supported the prosecution's version of events.
Issues: The main issues revolved around the credibility of the prosecution witnesses, the presence of common intent among the accused, and the sufficiency of evidence to prove the guilt of the accused under Section 332 IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the testimony of the prosecution witnesses, the medical evidence, and the lack of material discrepancies in the prosecution's case to uphold the conviction under Section 332 IPC.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the revision, affirming the judgments of the lower courts and upholding the conviction of the accused under Section 332 IPC.
Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
This petition has been filed against the judgment passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Sirmaur District at Nahan in Cri. Appeal No. 6-N/10 of 2004 dated 15.2.2008, whereby the learned Appellate Court has upheld the conviction of the petitioner for commission of offence punishable under Section 332 IPC passed by learned JMIC, Paonta Sahib, District Sirmaur in Cr. Case No. 76/2 of 98. The case of the prosecution was that one Sh. Milkhi Ram, complainant, was posted as Range Officer, Kaffota Range in Forest Department during the year 1988. On 18.3.1998 he along with Forest Guard Gurdit Singh and Block Officer, Prem Singh were on official tour from village Bhatrog to Sataun at around 9:00 a.m., when they saw that some persons were illegally extracting the limestone and indulging in illegal mining near Giri River, RF Janjli C-6. They also discovered that some people were loading lime stones in tractors and other were digging at the spot. The persons who were indulging in illegal activities in RF Janjali C-6 ran away from the spot along with tractors when they saw the forest officials. However, two tractors and certain tools used for digging were left behind on the spot by these persons. In these circumstances, the complainant picked up the tools and brought the same near Giri River and prepared a list of the same as forest offence was being committed by these persons who had ran away from the spot. At about 11:45 a.m. accused Madan Singh along with Surinder Singh and Atma Ram and one more person came to the spot in a drunkard condition and started demanding the tools from the complainant. When he refused to give the tools, he was beaten up by the said persons, as a result of which he received injuries. The complainant was rescued by the officials accompanying him and all of them ran to the Police Post Rajban to save themselves. In the meanwhile, son of accused Atma Ram also followed the complainant and warned him with dire consequences in case he did not compromise. The uniform of the complainant was torn and the complainant at about 2:30 p.m., narrated the matter to the police, on the basis of which report No.11 was recorded in the relevant register and the same was sent to Police Station, Paonta Sahib, pursuant to which, FIR under Sections 353, 332 read with Section 34 IPC was lodged against the accused. The complainant was medically examined and was also subjected to medical examination. After the FIR was lodged, the spot was visited by the investigating officer who also prepared the spot map. The torn uniform of the complainant was taken into possession and on 22.3.1998 accused Madan handed over one ‘stick’, one ‘belcha’ and one ‘panji’ to the police which he confessed was used in the commission of offence. Challan was presented under Sections 353,332 read with Section 34 IPC. In the meanwhile, accused Surinder Singh died and vide order dated 13.12.1999 proceedings were dropped against him. Charge under Section 332 IPC was framed against accused Madan Singh and Atma Ram, who denied the same and claimed to be tried. Thereafter, accused Atma Ram also died on 12.5.2001 and proceedings against him were also dropped vide order dated 16.7.2001.
2. On the basis of material produced on record by the prosecution, the learned Trial Court came to the conclusion that it stood proved beyond all reasonable doubt that on 18.3.1998 at about 11:45 a.m at place Bhatrog accused Madan Singh along with other two persons assaulted complainant, Milkhi Ram, and voluntarily caused simple injury to him knowing fully well that he was a public servant and was discharging his public duties and this act was committed by the accused with an intent to deter/prevent the complainant from discharging his duty, as a public servant who at the relevant time was collecting the tool used by some unknown offender in the commission of forest offence in Reserve Forest Janjehli, C-6 and was preparing the list of tools, so that he could inves
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.