Tarlok Singh Chauhan J.

Since common questions of law arise for consideration, therefore, both these writ petitions are taken together and are being disposed of by way of a common judgment.

2. CWP No.92 of 2016 has been filed for the following relief:

“In view of the facts and circumstances narrated hereinabove, it is humbly prayed that the present petition may kindly be allowed and the order dated 6.11.2015 may kindly be set aside besides setting aside the OA No. 4272 of 2015 being without jurisdiction in the interest of justice and fair play.”

Whereas CWP No.692 of 2016 has been filed for the following reliefs:

“1. That respondents may kindly be directed to implement the policy and comply with directions passed in CWP No.2836 of 2015 titled as Monika Thakur and ors Vs. State of HP and ors in a time bound manner.

2. That advertisement dated 9.10.2015 may kindly be stayed and in alternative posts on which petitioners are to be adjusted as per the policy may kindly be kept reserved in the interest of justice and fair play.

3. That direction may kindly be issued not to disturb and dislodge the petitioners from their posts.”

3. With the consent of the parties, CWP No.92 of 2016, tit