SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 1435

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
Prem Lata – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Road Transport Corporation – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.

This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 09/07/2010, made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, (1), Sirmaur at Nahan, H.P. in 89-MAC/2 of 2008, titled Smt. Prem Lata and another versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another, for short “the Tribunal”, whereby the claim petition filed by the claimants came to be partly allowed and Rs.50,000/- was awarded in favour of the claimants and against respondents No.1 and 2, under no fault liability, hereinafter referred to as “the impugned award”, for short.

2. Himachal Road Transport Corporation and driver have not questioned the impugned award on any ground. Thus, the same has attained the finality so far as it relates to them.

3. The claimants have questioned the impugned award on the grounds taken in the memo of appeal.

4. The claimants being the victims of a vehicular accident had filed claim petition before the Tribunal for the grant of compensation on account death of Rahul Panwar, who was working as a teacher/tutor and farmer, earning Rs.8750/- per month, was coming fro
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top