SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 1346

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J.
Sh. Dharam Pal - Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Uttam Chand - Respondent
CMPMO No. 336 of 2015
Decided on : 09-08-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Lalit Kumar Sehgal, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate.

Admissibility of evidence - spot map without demarcation report

Headnote:

Order 7 Rule 14(3) - Admissibility of Spot Map Without Demarcation Report

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought to place a spot map on record in a civil proceeding, but the application was declined due to lack of primary proof such as a demarcation report.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the spot map alone, without the demarcation report and other proceedings, had no evidentiary value and was rightly refused to be taken on record. However, as the demarcation report and other records were now available, the application needed fresh consideration.

Issues: Admissibility of spot map without demarcation report, availability of additional records after the initial application

Ratio Decidendi: The spot map alone, without supporting primary proof, has no evidentiary value. The application for placing the spot map on record needed fresh consideration in light of the now available records.

Final Decision: The impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the application was remanded back to the trial court for fresh disposal in accordance with law.

JUDGMENT :

Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J (Oral).

Heard. Challenge herein is to an order dated 18.07.2015 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Karsog, District Mandi, H.P. in an application filed under Order 7 Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, registered as CMA No. 98-IV/2015, whereby the prayer made in the application qua placing on record the spot map filed therewith has been declined on the ground that without primary proof such as demarcation report etc., the spot map is not admissible in evidence. The application, as such, was dismissed.

2. Learned counsel submits that at the time when the application for placing on record the spot map filed, copy of demarcation report and other records pertaining to the demarcation proceedings was not available with the petitioner-plaintiff and only the copy of spot map was made available to him. Now, after dismissal of the application, the demarcation report and other record, i.e. the statements of the parties and local residents have also been supplied to him.

3. The copy of demarcation report, statements of the parties, spot map and that of the defendant and other right holders are annexed to the application as Annexure P-6, which was filed before the Assistant Collector 1st Grade for conducting demarcation of the land in dispute. Since it is only the spot map alone could be filed along with the application under Order 7 Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, learned trial Judge was absolutely justified while declining the permission to take the same on record, because without demarcation report and other proceedings, the spot map was nothing but merely a waste paper, having no evidentiary value. The same as such was rightly refused to be taken on record. However, now not only copy of the application filed before the Assistant Collector 1st Grade, Annexure P-6, but that of the demarcation report, statements of the parties and other right holders recorded during the course of demarcation proceedings and spot map are available with the petitioner-plaintiff. Therefore, the application, Annexure P-7 under Order 7 Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure needs consideration afresh in the light of the records now available with the petitioner-plaintiff.

4. The impugned order, as such, is quashed and set aside. The application is remanded back to the trial Court for fresh disposal in accordance with law. The petitioner-plaintiff shall place on record the documents i.e. the copy of application under Section 107 of the H.P. Land Revenue Act filed before the Assistant Collector 1st Grade for demarcation of the land, copy of demarcation report, copies of the statements recorded during the course of demarcation proceedings in the trial Court by way of supplementary affidavit. It is thereafter the application shall be disposed of afresh after affording the opportunity of being heard to the parties on both sides. The parties through learned counsel representing them are directed to appear in the trial Court on 5th September, 2016.

5. This petition is accordingly allowed and stands disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

An authenticated copy of this judgment be sent to learned trial Judge for compliance.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top