MANSOOR AHMAD MIR
Dev Raj – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Lal – Respondent
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.
By the medium of FAOs No. 357, 359, 360 and 361 of 2012, the owner-insured has questioned the judgment and award, dated 10th May, 2012, made by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (II), Mandi Camp at Karsog (for short “the Tribunal”) in Claim Petitions No. 60 of 2008, 59 of 2008, 62 of 2008 and 63 of 2008, whereby compensation to the tune of 31,320/-, 2,60,000/-, 3,94,000/- and 37,000/- respectively, with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the respective claim petitions till its realization, came to be awarded in favour of the claimants and the owner-insured came to be saddled with liability (for short “the impugned awards”).
2. The claimants in Claim Petitions No. 59 of 2008, 63 of 2008 and 60 of 2008 have questioned the respective impugned awards also on the ground of adequacy of compensation.
3. All these appeals are outcome of one motor vehicular accident, which was allegedly caused by the driver, namely Shri Dinesh Kumar, while driving jeep, bearing registration No. HP-631797, rashly and negligently, on 5th May, 2008, at about 8.30 P.M. near Rohanda, in which two persons sustained injuries and succumbed to the injuries and three pe
R.D. Hattangadi versus M/s Pest Control (India) Pvt. Ltd. & others
Sarla Verma (Smt) and others versus Delhi Transport Corporation and another
Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. versus Saju P. Paul and another
S. Iyyapan versus United India Insurance Company Limited and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.