SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 875

MANSOOR AHMAD MIR, SANDEEP SHARMA
Bharat Bhushan – Appellant
Versus
Himachal Pradesh University – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Mr. Kulbhushan Khajuria
For the Respondents: Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj

JUDGMENT :

Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.

CMP (M) No. 1493 of 2015 & RP No. 59 of 2016

The review petitioner-applicant has sought review of judgment and order, dated 19th May, 2014, made by this Court in LPA No. 210 of 2011, titled as Shri Bharat Bhushan versus Himachal Pradesh University & others, whereby the appeal filed by the review petitioner-applicant came to be dismissed.

2. It is apt to record herein that the review petitioner-applicant had questioned the said judgment before the Apex Court by the medium of SLP (C) No. 17718 of 2014, which was dismissed vide order, dated 14th November, 2014.

3. In view of the dismissal of the SLP, no review will lie.

4. We have otherwise gone through the review petition and are of the view that no case for condoning the delay or review is made out in terms of the mandate of Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short “CPC”) read with Order 47 CPC.

5. Having said so, the limitation petition is dismissed. Consequently, the review petition is dismissed as time barred.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top