Sandeep Sharma, J.

Present Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment dated 1.9.2015 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No.1938 of 2010, whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner (appellant herein), was dismissed, (for short ‘impugned judgment’).

2. Briefly stated, the facts necessary for adjudication of the case are that on 19.5.1989, the petitioner was engaged as salesman/commission agent by respondent No.4-Society on 50% commission basis. However, in General House of respondent No.4-Society held on 3.6.2001 (Annexure P-1), taking note of the audit report for the year 1999-2000, wherein it was pointed that an amount of Rs.56115.60 paise is due from petitioner Nikku Ram, took a decision to afford one month time to the petitioner for recovery of the aforesaid amount, reserving its right to take legal action against him.

3. In the aforesaid meeting of General House, working of petitioner was also discussed, wherein Members of the House were informed that work and conduct of the official, named above, has not been found satisfactory in the last few years. It was also brought to the notice of the House that the petitioner has not lifted