SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 950

CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Anita Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Dina Nath – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. K.D. Sood, Mr. Ankit Aggarwal
For the Respondents: Mr. Neel Kamal Sharma

JUDGMENT :

Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.

The present regular second appeal is maintained by the appellants (hereinafter called as “the plaintiffs”) against the respondents (hereinafter called as “the defendants”) assailing the impugned judgment and decree dated 11.01.2005, passed by learned District Judge, Mandi, H.P. in Civil Appeal No. 65 of 2003.

2. Briefly stating the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiffs are joint owners-in-possession with the defendants of the suit land comprised in Khata No. 190, Khatauni No. 360, Khasras No. 530, 531, 533, 534, 535, 536, 537, 538, 540 and 541, Kitas 10, measuring 8966.0 square meters, situated in Mauja Bari, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. A house, having a room in the ground floor and verandah (courtyard) in front of it, which is in possession of the plaintiff, is situated in the suit land, which is denoted by Khasra No. 538/1. As per the plaintiffs, the defendants started raising construction of first floor over and above the room and verandah, which is in possession of the plaintiffs, therefore, the defendants were requested not to raise construction till partition of the property is carried out, but the de












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top