SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 825

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Jagan Nath – Petitioner
Versus
National Hydro-Electric & Another – Respondents
CWP No. 2088 of 2008
Decided On : 17-06-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Surinder Saklani, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate.

The rule-making authority has the prerogative to prescribe qualifications for recruitment and promotion, and the court's interference is limited as long as the qualifications are reasonably relevant and have a rational nexus with the functions and duties attached to the post.

Headnote:

Qualification - Promotion Policy - B.E.(Civil), AMIE (Civil), M.Sc/B.Sc in Chemistry or Physics - Rules/procedure of promotion policy - Annexure P-3, Annexure P-4, Annexure P-1, Annexure P-2, Annexure P-5 - The court discussed the minimum qualifications prescribed for promotion beyond the post of Deputy Manager in the Research Wing and the rules/procedure of promotion policy. The court highlighted the qualifications required for the post of Research Officer and the petitioner's contention that the prescribed qualifications were not suitable for the job responsibilities. The court also considered the representations and documents submitted by the petitioner to support his claim, as well as the respondents' justifications for the prescribed qualifications. The legal provisions related to the authority of the rule-making authority to prescribe qualifications and the limitations of the court in interfering with such qualifications were discussed and influenced the court's decision to dismiss the petition.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the minimum qualifications prescribed for promotion beyond the post of Deputy Manager in the Research Wing, alleging that the qualifications were not suitable for the job responsibilities. The petitioner had already retired from service, and the court noted that no effective relief could be granted at this stage.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the respondents rejected the petitioner's representation without proper consideration and without affording the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. However, due to the petitioner's retirement, directing the respondents to reconsider the representation at this stage would serve no purpose.

Issues: The issues involved the minimum qualifications prescribed for promotion in the Research Wing, the petitioner's contentions regarding the suitability of the prescribed qualifications, and the respondents' rejection of the petitioner's representation without proper consideration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the rule-making authority has the prerogative to prescribe qualifications for recruitment and promotion, and the court's interference is limited as long as the qualifications are reasonably relevant and have a rational nexus with the functions and duties attached to the post. The court cited legal principles emphasizing the authority of the state to prescribe qualifications and the limitations of the court in interfering with such qualifications.

Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

1. By way of present writ petition, petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:-

(a) That a writ of certiorari may be issued thereby setting aside the minimum qualification prescribed for considering promotion beyond the post of Deputy Manager in the Research Wing in the Rules/procedure of promotion policy of the respondents as given vide clause 6 and letters whereby representations of the petitioner for the purpose are rejected may very kindly be set aside.

(b) That a Writ Mandamus may very kindly be issued thereby directing the respondents to prescribe requisite qualification meant for the purpose i.e. B.E.(Civil) with benefit of improvement of qualification viz. AMIE (Civil) and M.Sc/B.Sc in Chemistry or Physics with relatively more experience as is provided by the Ministry of Energy, Department of Power, New Delhi and further as is available with respect to the post being advertised and filled up by the Union Public Service Commission for the post of Research Officers in the Research Wing of the field of Concrete Technology and Soil Engineering as otherwise, Corporation is acting contrary to the national interest by providing qualification of M.Sc. from recognized University in any faculty, which qualification as provided for the purpose in law by any stretch of imagination cannot be held good, with directions to the respondents to reconsider and re-frame the Rules with respect to the qualification in Rules/promotion policy vide clause No. 6, and accordingly, to reconsider and grant benefit to the petitioner throughout from the date same fell due to the petitioner with respect to the promotion, in the interest of law and justice.

(c) Directions may be given to the respondents to produce the records of the case.

(d) Any other and further reliefs to which the petitioner is found fit and proper may also very kindly be granted in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents.

2. Briefly stated facts necessary for the adjudication of the case are that the petitioner was appointed as Scientific Assistant Grade-I vide order dated 2.2.1978 and he joined as such on 20.7.1978 in Salal Hydro Electric Project and was posted in Quality Control Unit. Vide order dated 20.7.1978, petitioner was reappointed as Research Assistant (Regular) and was posted in Quality Control Division. However, on account of transfer of Salal Project to NHPC Limited, services of the petitioner were transferred in the same capacity, designation and nature of job with effect from 1.4.1983 to NHPC Limited. Petitioner also averred that owing to re-designation of the post of Research Assistant, designation of the petitioner was changed vide letter dated 14.1.1985 and he was promoted w.e.f. 1.7.1984 as Senior Supervisor (Research) Grade-II. However, vide order dated 1.7.1988, petitioner was promoted as Senior Supervisor Grade-1 and thereafter promoted as Research Officer in the year, 1992 and Assistant Manager (Research) in the year, 1996. In the year 2001, petitioner was promoted as Deputy Manager and as Manager (Research) w.e.f. 1.4.2006.

3. Petitioner being aggrieved with the advertisement No. PER/4/1990 (Annexure P-3) issued by the respondents, inviting applications for the few posts in its Corporate Office and existing/future Projects/Units. Vide aforesaid advertisement; respondents also invited application for the post of Research Officer. Perusal of the advertisement suggests that a person with M.Sc in Chemistry or Physics was eligible to apply for the aforesaid posts. Petitioner alleged that a person with M.Sc in Chemistry or physics with experience in the field of Concrete Technology and Soil Mechanics cannot be termed to be a fit person to work in the said field. Petitioner also alleged that the respondents solely with a view to help their favourites, issued Rules/Procedure of promotion policy (Annexure P-4), wherein for the post in Research Wing, qualification of M.Sc from a recognized university has been prescribed. Petition
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top