TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Soma Devi – Appellant
Versus
Mast Ram – Respondent
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
The plaintiff is the appellant, who has lost in both the Courts below and has filed the second appeal praying therein for setting aside the judgments and decrees so passed by the Courts below.
2. The plaintiff/appellant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘plaintiff’) sought a declaration to the effect that the alleged Will dated 14.6.2000 allegedly executed by Paras Ram in favour of the respondent/defendant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘defendant’), was fictitious and is the result of undue influence and, therefore, he be restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from interfering in the suit land comprised in Khewat No. 213, Khatauni No. 240, Khasra Nos. 701, 713, Kita-2, measuring 3-16-17 situated in Muhal Dehar/75, Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P.
3. The plaintiff claimed herself to be the legally wedded wife of Paras Ram, who expired on 19.5.2001, that too, after suffering long ailment. It was claimed that the plaintiff was the sole surviving legal heir of Paras Ram, who was owner in possession of the suit land and had expired without leaving behind any Will regarding the suit land. It was further averred that she came to know
Afsar Shaikh and another v. Soleman Bibi and others
H. Venkatachala Iyengar vs. B.N. Thimmajamma and others
Joseph Antony Lazarus vs. A.J. Francis
Ladli Parshad Jaiswal v. The Karnal Distillery Co., Ltd. Karnal & Ors.
R. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thirnmajamma & Others
Subhas Chandra Das Mushib v. Ganga Prosad Das Mushib and others
Smt. Jaswant Kaur vs. Smt. Amrit Kaur and others
Shashi Kumar Banerjee and others vs. Subodh Kumar Banerjee and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.