SURESHWAR THAKUR
Tej Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
The instant appeal stands directed by the appellant/convict against judgment recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Mandi, H.P. in Sessions Trial No.4 of 2005 on 7.5.2007, whereby, he convicted the accused/appellant herein for his committing offences punishable under Sections 436 and 427 besides sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for the aforesaid offences as under:
Sections
Sentenced imposed
436 of the IPC
Accused stands sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in case of default in the payment of fine amount the accused shall further undergo imprisonment for one years.
427 of the IPC
Sentenced to suffer imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default to undergo imprisonment for 1 month.
2. The facts relevant to decide the instant case are that on the intervening night of 13th and 14th October, 2003, complainant Narotam Ram was watching television at 10.45 p.m. in his house. Then he heard murmuring of persons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.