SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(HP) 1996

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Tej Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Atul Jhingan
For the Respondent: Mr. Vivek Singh Attri

JUDGMENT :

Sureshwar Thakur, J.

The instant appeal stands directed by the appellant/convict against judgment recorded by the learned Sessions Judge, Mandi, H.P. in Sessions Trial No.4 of 2005 on 7.5.2007, whereby, he convicted the accused/appellant herein for his committing offences punishable under Sections 436 and 427 besides sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for the aforesaid offences as under:

Sections

Sentenced imposed

436 of the IPC

Accused stands sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years with fine of Rs.10,000/-, in case of default in the payment of fine amount the accused shall further undergo imprisonment for one years.

427 of the IPC

Sentenced to suffer imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default to undergo imprisonment for 1 month.

2. The facts relevant to decide the instant case are that on the intervening night of 13th and 14th October, 2003, complainant Narotam Ram was watching television at 10.45 p.m. in his house. Then he heard murmuring of persons













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top