IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Mansoor Ahmad Mir & Tarlok Singh Chauhan, JJ.
Maharishi Markandeshwar Medical College and Hospital and others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and others – Respondents
CWP No. 4773 of 2015
Decided On : 20-12- 2016
MCI Act - Affiliation of Medical College - Section 3, Section 5, Section 7 of Himachal Pradesh University Act, 1970 - Summary of Acts and Sections
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to challenge the amendment in the Himachal Pradesh Private Medical Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006, specifically focusing on the amendment in sub-section (6-a) of section 3. The petitioners, an unaided private college established by a university trust, sought affiliation for a new medical college at Kumarhatti, Solan under the university. The State Government had issued an essentiality certificate subject to compliance with regulations/terms issued by the Medical Council of India and the State, and the admission, fee structure, and related issues governed by the Himachal Pradesh Private Medical Education Institutions Act, 2006.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the jurisdictional authority for deciding the affiliation of the medical college, considering the roles of the Central Government, State Government, and the petitioner-college. The court emphasized the distinction between recognition and affiliation, highlighting the authority of the Medical Council of India (MCI) in granting recognition and the State Government/University in granting affiliation. The court also discussed the provisions of the MCI Act, the Himachal Pradesh University Act, 1970, and the powers and responsibilities of the MCI, State Government, and affiliating bodies in the context of recognition and affiliation of medical colleges.
Issues: The key issue was the authority to decide the affiliation of the medical college, involving the roles of the Central Government, State Government, and the petitioner-college. The court also addressed the distinction between recognition and affiliation, and the respective powers and responsibilities of the MCI, State Government, and affiliating bodies.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while the MCI has the paramount role in according recognition, the affiliation is best left to the State Government/University/examining body. The court emphasized that the State Government has the power to regulate academic excellence, particularly in matters of admissions to institutions, and is competent to prescribe merit-based admission processes for creating a uniform admission process through CET. The court also highlighted the provisions of the Himachal Pradesh University Act, 1970, and the limitations on the authority of the MCI or the Central Government to dictate terms to the State regarding the grant of affiliation to a particular University.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed, and the court held that the MCI has the paramount role in according recognition, while the affiliation is best left to the State Government/University/examining body. The court emphasized the State's power to regulate academic excellence and the limitations on the authority of the MCI or the Central Government to dictate terms to the State regarding the grant of affiliation to a particular University.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
This instant writ petition has been filed with the following substantive prayers:
(i) To issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order striking down sections 3 (6), 3 (6) (a) and 3 (6) (b) of the Himachal Pradesh Private Medical Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 as amended vide Amendment Act No. 24 of 2015 as null and void being wholly arbitrary, grossly malafide, in contravention of the law settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and in naked breach of the fundamental rights of the petitioners under Article 19 (1) (g) of the Constitution of India.
(ii) To issue the orders of appropriate nature that the petitioner No.1 MM Medical College and Hospital or any other intuitions of Medical Streams which may be started by petitioners be governed by the MMU (E&R) Act.”
2. It is vide notification dated 30.9.2015 that the State Government amended the Himachal Pradesh Private Medical Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fee) Act, 2006 (Act No. 24 of 2015). The amendment carried in section 3 reads thus:
3. Amendment of section 3.- In section 3 of the principal Act, for sub-section (6), the following sub-section shall be substituted, namely:-
“(6) If the State Government is satisfied that the institution affiliated to the Himachal Pradesh University or any other University has contravened any of the provisions of this Act, it may recommend to that University for withdrawal of recognition or affiliation of such institution.
(6-a) In order to insure common standards for maintaining the excellence of Medical Education in the State, the Himachal Pradesh University shall have the exclusive power to affiliate Private Medical Education Institutions set up in the State; and
(6-b) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the Private Medical Educational Institutions shall be bound to comply with all the rules, directions and notifications issued by the State Government, from time to time, and provide all such facilities and assistance as are required to implement such rules, directions and notifications.”
3. However, at the time of arguments, the petitioners have confined their arguments only to the amendment carried in sub-section (6-a) of section 3.
4. One of the moot questions that therefore arises for consideration in the instant petition is as to which authority has the power to decide regarding the affiliation of Medical College. Is it the Central Government through MCI or the State Government or is the petitioner-college, which is alleged to be constituent of Maharishi Markandeshwar University established under the Maharishi Markandeshwar University (Establishment and Regulation) Act, 2010, that can decide this question?
However, before answering the question certain facts, as pleaded may be recapitulated:
5. The petitioner No.1 is an unaided private college established by the petitioner No.3-Maharishi Markandeshwar University Trust (for short ‘University Trust’) and is a constituent of petitioner No.2 Maharishi Markandeshwar University (for short University).
6. The University was set up pursuant to letter of intent issued by the State Government on 20.8.2008 under section 5 (1) of the Himachal Pradesh Private Universities (Establishment and Regulations) Act, 2006 ( for short ‘Private University Act’).
7. The petitioner-trust was issued an essentiality certificate by the State for establishment of a Medical College, subject to its observing all codal formalities as per law/prevailing Act/Rules/Instructions and it was further made clear that the Trust would abide by the ‘Private University Act’.
8. The petitioner-University after obtaining the essentiality certificate purchased 125.02 bighas of land at Khalogra in Kumarhatti-Solan contiguous to the land purchased by it for setting up the petitioner-University. On 16.6.2010, the Maharishi Markandeshwar University (Establishment and Regulation) Act, 201
Bhartia Education Society vs. State of H.P.
Bharti Vidyapeeth (Deemed University) & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Dr. Preeti Srivastava & Anr. v. State of M.P. & Ors.
In Re: The Kerala Education Bill
Modern Dental College and Research Centre and others Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Rajasthan Prdesh Vaidya Samiti, Sardarshahar and another vs Union of India and others
State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. v. St. Joseph Teachers Training Institute and Anr.
State of Madhya Pradesh and another vs. Kumari Nivedita Jain and others
T.M.A Pai Foundation and Ors. v. State of Karnataka and Ors.
AI
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.