DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Prem Singh – Respondent
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
The present appeal is preferred by the appellant/State under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure assailing the judgment of acquittal, dated 06.01.2011, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., in Sessions Trial No.32 of 2010, whereby the accused has been acquitted of the charge framed against him under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’’).
2. Briefly stating, as per prosecution story, facts giving rise to the present appeal are that on 22.01.2010, ASI Man Singh, alongwith other police officials, was on patrol duty in official vehicle No.HP-34A-0213. When the police party reached at Bharthi-dhar, at about 6.00 AM, they saw one person coming on foot from upper Bharthi-dhar side holding a gunny sack in his hand and on seeing the vehicle of the police, he got perplexed and tried to turn back. The police officials, on suspicion, got down from the vehicle and nabbed the accused. The accused person disclosed his name as Prem Singh. There was suspicion in the mind of ASI Man Singh that the accused was carrying contraba
Bihari Nath Goswami Vs. Shiv Kumar Singh & Ors.
Girija Prasad vs. State of M.P.
Leela Ram (dead) through Duli Chand Vs. State of Haryana and Another
Mritunjoy Biswas Vs. Pranab @ Kuti Biswas and Anr.
Makhan Singh vs. State of Haryana
Rammi @ Rameshwar Vs. State of M.P.
Sampath Kumar Vs. Inspector of Police, Krishnagiri
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.