Mansoor Ahmad Mir, J.

Common question – Whether the instant cases are maintainable in the present form - is involved in all these cases, therefore, the same were clubbed and are taken up together.

2. Before the above question is determined, let us have a brief glance of the facts of the each case as under.

3. This appeal is directed against the judgment, dated 27th October, 2015, passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court, in CWP No.3635 of 2015, titled Mumtaz Ahmad vs. State of H.P. and others, whereby the writ petition filed by the petitioner (appellant herein) came to be dismissed, (for short the impugned judgment).

4. The writ petitioner was appointed as Immam of Boileauganj Mosque, submitted his resignation on 22.7.2003 reserving his right to continue as voluntary Immam and to keep residential accommodation allotted to him, resignation was accepted on 31st July, 2003.

5. Vide Annexure P-3 (resolution dated 5th February, 2007), it was resolved by the writ respondents to discontinue the voluntary immamt of the writ petitioner and all facilities. The writ petition filed representations, but of no avail.

6. Thereafter, on 22.6.2007, writ respondents filed a civil suit befo