Sanjay Karol, J.

1. This is a subsequent bail application filed by petitioner Amit Jha on the strength of observations made by the apex court in Tarun Tejpal vs. State of Goa, (2015) 14 Supreme Court 481. This court deems it appropriate to reproduce the entire judgment as under:

“1 Heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.

2. After going through the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct that the petitioner be released on bail subject to the following conditions:

(a) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts or the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the Court or to any other authority.

(b) The petitioner shall remain present before the Court on the dates fixed for hearing of the case. If he wants to remain absent, then he shall take prior permission of the Court and in case of unavoidable circumstances for remaining absent, he shall immediately give intimation to the appropriate Court and also to the investigating agency and request that he may be permitted to be present through the counsel.

(c) The petitioner will dispute his identity as the accused in the cas