SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(HP) 190

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Subhadra Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Divya Raj Singh Thakur
For the Respondent: Ms. Parul Negi

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.

By way of this revision petition, the petitioner has challenged the judgment passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Shimla in Appeal No. 7-S/10 of 2008 dated 26.6.2008, whereby learned appellate court while maintaining the conviction of petitioner/accused under Section 228 of IPC, has modified the sentence imposed upon her by the learned trial court and has ordered the accused to undergo simple imprisonment till rising of the Court and to pay fine of Rs. 300/- and to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 07 days for want of payment of fine. Petitioner/accused has also laid challenge to the judgment passed by learned trial court i.e. the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class (4), Shimla dated 20.3.2008 vide which learned trial court convicted the accused for commission of offence punishable under Section 228 of IPC and sentenced her to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month and to pay fine of Rs. 300/- and to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 07 days in case of default of payment of fine.

2. Brief facts necessary for adjudication of the present case are that a com



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top