SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(HP) 480

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev Kumar & another – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 191, 283 OF 2008
Decided On : 01-06-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Law Officer
For the Respondents:Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's interpretation of the evidence presented to find the accused guilty of theft of cable wire and burning it to obtain copper, leading to the upheld conviction under Section 379 IPC.

Headnote:

Telegraph Act - Theft of Cable Wire - Section 377, Section 378 Cr.P.C. - Section 379 IPC - Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act - [Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act] - [The judgment discussed Section 379 IPC and Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act] - The court discussed the evidence and found the accused guilty of theft of cable wire and burning it to obtain copper. The court also upheld the sentence under Section 379 IPC and dismissed the appeal for enhancement of the sentence.

Fact of the Case:

The accused were convicted for theft of cable wire and converting it into copper. The lower Appellate Court acquitted the accused under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act and upheld the conviction under Section 379 IPC, but reduced the sentence to the period already undergone.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the accused guilty of theft of cable wire and burning it to obtain copper. The court upheld the sentence under Section 379 IPC and dismissed the appeal for enhancement of the sentence.

Issues: The issues involved the conviction of the accused under Section 379 IPC and Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act, the reduction of the sentence, and the acquittal under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found the accused guilty of theft of cable wire and burning it to obtain copper based on the evidence presented. The court upheld the sentence under Section 379 IPC and dismissed the appeal for enhancement of the sentence. The court also upheld the acquittal under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act due to lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

Final Decision: The court upheld the conviction under Section 379 IPC, dismissed the appeal for enhancement of the sentence, and upheld the acquittal under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act.

JUDGMENT :

Chander Bhusan Barowalia, J.

1. The present appeal (Cr.A No.191 of 2008) is maintained by the State of Himachal Pradesh under Section 377 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for enhancement of sentence, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur, Sessions Division at Rampur Bushahr, H.P., where by the learned lower Appellate Court has acquitted the accused under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act and upheld the sentence recorded by the learned trial Court under Section 379 IPC. However, the sentence is modified to the period already undergone. On the day the appeal was decided, the respondent-accused remained behind the bars for a little period of more than six weeks.

2. The second appeal (Cr.No.283 of 2008) is also maintained by the State of H.P. under Section 378 Cr.P.C., against the same judgment acquitting the accused persons (here in after referred to as the ‘accused’) by the learned lower Appellate Court for the offence committed under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act, for setting aside judgment of the learned Sessions Judge and convicting the accused under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act also.

3. Meaning thereby that both the appeals are directed against one judgment. However, the appeal No.191 of 2008 is for enhancement of the sentence under Section 379 IPC and Appeal No.283 of 2008 is separately moved for setting aside the judgment of acquittal and for convicting the accused under Section 5 of the Indian Telegraph Act. Both the appeals since arises from the same judgment and are being heard together and disposed of by a common judgment.

4. Briefly stating the facts giving rise to the present appeals are that as per the information received by the S.D.O.(Telecom) Rakesh Dutt, who appeared as PW1 in the learned trial Court on 9.7.2007 at about 2.00 P.M., some unknown persons had stolen 50 pairs of cable wire of about 1.5 kms laid by the B.S.N.L.(Telecom Deptt.) for providing telephone facility to the remote villages between H.P.M.C. Orchard, Rampur to Khanewali. The tentative cost of cable assessed by the S.D.O. concerned was Rs.81,000/-.

5. The S.D.O. (PW1) immediately reported the matter to the Police Station, Rampur, vide his written complaint Ex.PW-1/A. The Police registered FIR on the basis of the alleged complaint. During the course of investigation, copper wire, which was melted out of cable weighing 100 Kg was recovered from the house of accused Sanjeev Kumar in Case F.I.R. No.109/07, dated 9.7.2007, under Sections 342, 382, 506 I.P.C., which was found from the cable and was stolen by the accused persons from the place H.P.M.C. Orchard to Khanewali. As per prosecution, the accused persons had committed theft of the said cable and, thereafter, melted the same and converted into copper wire. The accused, Sanjeev had kept some of the wire in the forest and some wire in his house. The accused persons were also resorting the help of one more accused. The case property recovered from the house of the accused was taken into police custody. Accused persons failed to produce any document for keeping the copper wire. Both the accused persons were arrested on 10.7.2007.

6. On investigation, it has come on the record that the accused persons Sanjeev Kumar and Manoj Kumar had cut the cable along with one Jeewa Nand and converted the same into copper. The accused made the disclosure statement and the police, after recording the disclosure statement, recovered axe, Ex.PW-8/B used for cutting the cable, which was taken into possession by the police vide seizure memo Ex.PW-1/B. The Police prepared the site plan Ex.PW-8/A and the place of recovery of the axe, Ex.PW-8/B. The police took into possession site plan of place of recovery. Police took into possession burnt pieces of cable/wire, Ex.P-4 to Ex.P-81 vide seizure memo, Ex.PW-3/C and the site plan/demarcation was made vide memo, Ex. PW-3/B. Two bags containing copper wire weighing 100 kg. Ex.P-2 and Ex.P-3 were taken into possessions vide seizure memo, Ex.P
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top