SANDEEP SHARMA
Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Thakur – Appellant
Versus
Vikram Sood – Respondent
Sandeep Sharma, J.
By way of instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a prayer has been made on behalf of the accused-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the ‘accused’) for quashing and setting aside the order dated 17.12.2016 (Annexure P-4) passed by Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Manali in Complaint No.357-1 of 2012, whereby application having been filed by the accused under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C.’) has been dismissed.
2. Briefly stated facts, as emerged from the record, are that the respondent-complainant (hereinafter referred to as the ‘complainant’) instituted a complaint against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (for short the ‘Act’) in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Manali, stating therein that the accused allegedly approached complainant on 14.10.2009 and made a request to advance a sum of Rs.19,05,000/- for expansion of business. Complainant advanced a sum of Rs.19,05,000/- to the accused, who in lieu of the same issued three cheques in favour of the complainant towards discharge of his liability. However, fact remains that aforesaid ch
Jamat Raj Kewalji Govani v. State of Maharashtra
Kalyani Baskar (Mrs.) v. M.S. Sampoornam (Mrs.)
Mannan SK and others vs. State of West Bengal and another
Raja Ram Prasad Yadav vs. State of Bihar and another
Sudevanand v. State through C.B.I.
Vijay Kumar v. State of U.P. & Anr.
Talab Haji Hussain v. Madhukar Purshottam Mondkar & Anr.
Zahira Habibullah Sheikh (5) and another vs. State of Gujarat & others
Zahira Habibulla H. Sheikh & Anr. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.