SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(HP) 1603

RAJIV SHARMA
Roshan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Kishori Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sanjay Jaswal
For the Respondent: Neel Kamal Sharma

JUDGMENT :

Rajiv Sharma, J.

This Regular Second Appeal has been instituted against judgment and decree dated 23.6.2011 rendered by learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Mandi, District Mandi, HP in Civil Appeal No. 56 of 2010.

2. "Key facts" necessary for the adjudication of the present appeal are that the appellant-plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as 'plaintiff' for convenience sake) has filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction and in the alternative, for mandatory injunction against the respondent-defendant (hereinafter referred to as 'defendant' for convenience sake), alleging therein that the land comprised in Khewat Khatauni No. 99 min/116, Khasra No. 558, measuring 0-22-23 hectares situate at village Sukhar/507 III Hatli, Sub-Tehsil Baldwara, District Mandi, HP is residential house of both the parties and exist over the suit land. The defendant has started excavating the land which is situated on the backside of the house with the intention to raise pillars. Suit was contested by the defendant. According to the defendant, he was owner-in-possession of the suit land. He prepared a plot over the land. Replication was filed. Issues were framed on 25.11.2002 by the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top