Sureshwar Thakur, J.

1. The plaintiff instituted a suit against the defendants for declaration and for permanent prohibitory injunction. The suit of the plaintiff stood decreed by the learned trial Court. In an appeal carried therefrom by the aggrieved defendant No.1 before the learned First Appellate Court, the latter Court dismissed the appeal, whereupon, it concurred with the verdict recorded by the learned trial Court. In sequel thereto, the defendant No.1/appellant herein is driven to institute the instant appeal here before.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants before the learned trial Court for seeking decree for declaration that the plaintiff is owner in possession along with his share holders and that the entry in the name of the defendants in Column No.9 Ba-Bajah Rehan is illegal, void, without any basis against the Act, Rule and statute and against the principles of natural justice and for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in the ownership and possession of the plaintiff in any manner, whatsoever and in the alternative suit for possession on basis of title, if