DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY
Amit Rangra – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY, J.
1. The present again is a case where the petitioner and respondent No. 2 being classmates were in love with each other. They even had physical relations also well before their marriage. Subsequently, on account of opposition of parents of respondent No. 2-complainant certain differences cropped up amongst them which seem to have led blaming each other including the alleged threatening by the petitioner to post nude photos of respondent No. 2-complainant on Social Media. It is under these circumstances FIR Annexure P-1 came to be registered at the instance of respondent against the petitioner.
2. Now the petitioner and respondent No. 2 had solemnized marriage with each other. The FIR came to be registered against the petitioner as the parents of respondent No.2-complainant were not in favour of her marriage with him. Now both are living as husband and wife. Respondent No.2- complainant as per her statement recorded separately is no more interested to prosecute the case registered at her instance against her husband-the petitioner. Being so, in the changed circumstances, no fruitful purpose is likely to be served to allow the criminal proceedings la
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.