SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(HP) 1008

SANDEEP SHARMA
Anchal – Appellant
Versus
Raman Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. H.S. Rangra, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

By way of instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, prayer has been made to transfer HMP No. 69/2017 titled as Raman Kumar versus Smt. Anchal from the Court of learned Additional District Judge-I, Kangra at Dharamshala, District Kangra to the Court of learned District Judge, Chamba, District Chamba, Himachal Pradesh.

2. Before considering the aforesaid prayer having been made by the petitioner by way of instant petition, it may be noticed that this Court, taking note of averments contained in the petition, issued notice to the respondent on 29.5.2017, returnable on 20.6.2017. However, the fact remains that respondent, who was served through his mother, failed to put in appearance on 24.7.2017, but at that point of time, this Court instead of proceeding in the matter ex-parte, issued court notice returnable for 28.8.2017. Even on 28.8.2017, respondent failed to put in appearance but this Court, taking note of the nature of litigation pending before this Court, issued fresh court notice to the respondent specifically intimating therein that in case he fails to put in appearanc











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top