SURESHWAR THAKUR
Sohan Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent
Sureshwar Thakur, J.
The petitioners herein, who, are legal heirs of one Riharu Ram, through, the instant petition hence cast a challenge, upon, the validity of the orders, borne in Annexure P-5, whereunder, the authority concerned hence rescinded, the allotment of land, made vis-a-vis, one, Riharu Ram in the year 1978, while its exercising powers under the Himachal Pradesh Village Common Lands Vesting and Utilization Scheme, 1975 (hereinafter referred as the scheme of 1975).
2. All the averments, made, by the petitioners, in their petition, stand contested by the respondents, by the latter meetings replyies thereto. The respondents in their reply, rather validate the orders, borne, in Annexure P-5, whereas, contrarily, the counsel for the petitioner, vehemently contended qua it being ingrained, with, a pervasive gross illegality.
3. Apparently, upon, civil suit No. 25 of 2001, wherein, one Riharu Ram, qua whom grant of land, was made, under, the aforesaid scheme, stood arrayed as codefendant No.2 also wherein, the State of Himachal Pradesh, was impleaded as a party in the array of co- defendants, a pronouncement of dismissal of the plaintiff's aforesaid suit hence emanated,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.