TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Ankit – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
Since all these petitions arise out of the same FIR bearing FIR No. 40 of 2018 dated 26.4.2018, registered at Police Station, Gohar, District Mandi, H.P. under Sections 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D, 120-B, 201 and 34 IPC, therefore, these were taken up together for consideration and are being disposed of by a common judgment.
2. Cr. M.P.(M) Nos. 895 and 896 of 2018 have been filed by the petitioners seeking pre-arrest bail, whereas Cr. MP(M) Nos. 902 and 937 of 2018 have been filed for securing regular bail.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 26.4.2018 Sanjay Kumar son of Sh. Prakash Dohru resident of Palampur District Kangra, at present Manager Himachal Gramin Bank, Thunag, District Mandi, H.P. made a complaint to the police to the effect that one Lal Singh son of Dhani Ram, resident of Drunu, P.O. Shikawari, Tehsil Thunag, District Mandi, H.P. had brought 2000 x 25 notes to the bank for depositing the same in the bank. On the aforesaid date at about 11 a.m. Lal Singh came to the bank and asked the official of the bank for depositing the money by way of F.D. of sum of Rs.50,000/- and had shown the notes to the bank official. On seeing the same, it
Adri Dharan Das v. State of West Bengal
Bharat Chaudhary vs. State of Bihar
Bhadresh Bipinbhai Sheth vs. State of Gujarat and another
Central Bureau of Investigation vs. V. Vijay Sai Reddy
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v. State of Punjab
Muraleedharan vs. State of Kerala
State rep. by the CBI v. Anil Sharma
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.