SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

Cr. M.P. No. 1201 of 2018

The prayer made in the application is allowed. The applicant is arrayed as party respondent No. 2, in, the instant petition.

Cr. MMo No. 94 of 2018

The accused is facing charge for his allegedly committing offences, punishable under Section(s) 279, 337, 338 and Section 304-A of the Indian Penal Code. In proof of the charge, the prosecution had examined 14 witnesses. After the learned APP concerned, hence examining the aforesaid number of prosecution witnesses, she made a statement before the learned trial Judge, qua hers closing the prosecution evidence. However, subsequent thereto, the learned APP concerned, moved an application, cast under the provisions of Section 311 Cr. P.C., wherein, hence leave of the Court, was asked, for examining, one, Chain Singh, as a prosecution witness. Upon the aforesaid application, the learned trial Judge, accorded the apt relief, to the prosecution. The accused is aggrieved therefrom, hence has proceeded, to, impugn the verdict pronounced thereon, by the learned trial Judge.

2. The witness concerned, namely Chain Singh, was cited as a prosecution witness, and, after the examination, of, an ocular