SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(HP) 694

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Rajinder Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. T.S. Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Hemant Vaid, Addl. A.G.

JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The instant appeal stand directed, against, the verdict rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Una, in criminal case No. 17/2009, where under, he returned findings of conviction, upon, the accused in respect of charges framed, under, Sections 341, 323, 307, 506 read with Section 34 IPC.

2. Briefly stated the case of the prosecution is that on 2.6.2009 at about 2 p.m. near railway bridge near village Badehar, Tehsil and District Una, the accused persons after forming common intention, wrongly restrained Kulwinder Singh, Surinder Kumar and Sandeep Kumar from proceeding further towards their residences by blocking the road. Accused persons had parked their Maruti car bearing registration No. HP-20-9145 right in front of the motor-cycle driven by injured Sandeep Kumar. Thereafter, accused Shibbu took out an iron tyre liver from his car and hit Sandeep Kumar. Other accused persons also gave fist and kick blows on Sandeep Kumar, Surinder Kumar and Kulwinder Singh. It is also alleged that accused persons, thereafter left the place of occurrence after threatening the complainants with dire consequences. Injured Sandeep Kumar dro













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top