SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(HP) 774

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Vishal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Sharma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Munish Kumar Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Jyotirmay Bhatt, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The complainant/appellant herein, is aggrieved, by the judgment of acquittal pronounced by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bilaspur, H.P., upon, Case No. 200/2 of 2006, on 31.07.2012, hence has instituted there from, the, instant appeal before this Court.

2. The facts relevant to decide the instant case, are that during the year 2003, accused Shashi Sharma, who was a registered contractor of P.W.D., and, his close friend entered into an oral agreement for sharing the profits of the business, on 50% basis and as such, the complainant financed the accused and used to deal with all works issued upon the name of the accused. The complainant has submitted that from the year 2003 to 2006, both of them worked jointly and the accused was under a liability of Rs.6,55,000/-, which was to be paid by the accused to him upto August 2006, but he paid only Rs.1 lac through cheque bearing No.072936 dated 25.8.2006, and, for the balance payment he issued another cheque No.789288 dated 30.8.2006 for Rs.5,25,000/- to discharge his legal liability. The said cheque was presented by the complainant with the banker for encashment, but it was dishonoured on the g










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top