Peer Mohammad Azad vs State of H. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2018 Supreme(HP) 917

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Peer Mohammad Azad – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Anoop Chitkara, Adv., Syed Wasiq, Adv., Ab Majid, Adv., Sheetal Vayas, Adv., Hemant Vaid, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sureshwar Thakur, J.

All the aforesaid appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment, as, all arise, from, a common verdict rendered, by the learned trial Court.

2. The learned trial Court convicted besides sentenced the accused/convicts, namely, Gulam Hassan Hakim, Gulzar Ahmad Hakim, and, Peer Mohammad Azad, in, the hereinafter extracted manner:-

Sr. No.	Name of the accused	Under Section	Sentence	Fine	In default of payment of fine
1.	Gulam Hassan Hakim	U/s 376 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for 7 years	Rs.10,000/-	Simple imprisonment for 3 months
		U/s 406 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for three years	Rs.5,000/-	Simple imprisonment for 1 month
		U/s 420 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for three years	Rs.5,000/-	Simple imprisonment for 1 month
		U/s 494 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for three years	Rs.5,000/-	Simple imprisonment for 1 month
		U/s 495 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for seven years	Rs.5,000/-	Simple imprisonment for three months
		U/s 496 IPC	Rigorous imprisonment for three years	Rs.5,000

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2018 Supreme(HP) 917

SURESHWAR THAKURPeer Mohammad Azad – AppellantVersusState of H. P. – Respondent

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Peer Mohammad Azad – Appellant
Versus
State of H. P. – Respondent