TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Narinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Tej Ram – Respondent
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
1. Defendant No.1 is the appellant, who aggrieved by the decree of the learned trial court, whereby suit of the plaintiffs was partly decreed, as affirmed by the learned first appellate court, has filed the instant regular second appeal.
2. The parties shall be referred to as the “plaintiffs” “defendant” and “proforma defendants”.
3. Briefly stated the facts leading to filing of the present appeal are that the land comprised in Khata No. 115/110 min, Khatauni Nos. 196, 197/196, 198/197, 199/198, 200/199, 201/200, Khasra Nos. 708, 1988/949, 950, 1758/1063, 1121, 1154, 1158, 1160, 1224, Kita-9 measuring 6-4-4 bighas and 1760/1101, 1314, 1761/1101, 1759/1063, 1081, 1313, Kita-6 measuring 5-8-6 bighas Kita15, measuring 11-13-0 bighas, situated at Mauza Pangna, Tehsil Karsog, District Mandi, HP was recorded in the ownership and possession of Bholla Dutt and proforma defendants No. 2 to 15 as per jamabandi for the year 1995- 96. The land comprised in Khewat No. 330 min/570 min, Khasra No. 707 measuring 10-11-10 bighas, situated at Mohal Pangna was Abadi Deh in which deceased Bholla Dutt, father of the plaintiffs, was owner in possession of the half shar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.