SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(HP) 302

SANDEEP SHARMA
Rohit – Appellant
Versus
Rashik – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Maan Singh, Adv.,
For the Respondent: Ashwani Kaundal, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Cr.Mp No. 631 of 2019

By way of instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.PC., prayer has been made on behalf of the applicant/petitioner for recalling the judgment dated 15.7.2016, passed by this Court in Criminal Revision No. 7 of 2015, whereby Criminal revision referred herein above, came to be dismissed for non-prosecution.

2. Averments contained in the application, which has been processed through Superintendent, Modern Central Jail, Nahan, suggest that due to mis-communication, applicant/petitioner was unable to impart proper instructions to Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate, who was earlier representing him in Criminal Revision No. 7 of 2015, as a consequence of which, criminal revision petition referred herein above, came to be dismissed for non-prosecution.

3. On 15.7.2016, learned counsel for the applicant/petitioner informed this Court that despite several communications, applicant/petitioner is not coming forward to pursue the matter and as such, Court having taken note of the fact that despite repeated opportunities, applicant/petitioner failed to take steps for the service of the respondent, dismissed the criminal revision petition having been fi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top