TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, ANOOP CHITKARA
Gulshan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.
Aggrieved by the dismissal of his writ petition, the appellant has filed the instant Letters Patent Appeal.
2. Brief facts giving rise to the filing of the present appeal are that the appellant was deputed to drive the departmental vehicle from Shimla to Kalka. According to the appellant, when he was coming back to Shimla, he got down from the vehicle and was overpowered by some unknown persons. Such persons drugged him and when he regained consciousness, he found himself at his residence on 06.10.2004. Whereas, the fact of the matter is that the vehicle of the appellant had met with an accident on the evening of the same day at Kachighati, Shimla, causing loss to the tune of Rs.59,190/-. But, the appellant neither reported the matter to the police nor apprised the department. This led initiation of departmental proceedings against appellant for which he was served a memorandum under Rule 14 of CCS(CCA) Rules, 1965 dated 02.12.2004. The appellant filed a detailed reply to the same dated 10.12.2004.
3. The Inquiry Officer was appointed, who submitted his report to the Disciplinary Authority. The Inquiry Officer gave findings that the delinquent offici
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.