SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(HP) 738

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Kishori Lal – Appellant
Versus
Vijay Kumar Sood – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
G.C. Gupta, Adv., Meera Devi, Adv., Ajay Kumar, Adv., Rohini Karol, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.

By way of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has challenged order dated 08.05.2019 passed by the Court of learned District Judge, Shimla, vide which an application filed by the present petitioner under Order 7, Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of plaint, has been dismissed.

2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are that respondents/plaintiffs have filed a suit for possession against the petitioner/defendant with respect to the portion of a shop, measuring about 5x7 feet, in shop No. 93, The Mall Shimla, built upon land comprised in Khasra No. 627, Bazaar Ward, Bada Shimla, as also for recovery of use and occupation charges. A decree for recovery of 1.00 Lac alongwith pendilite and future interest has also been prayed for.

3. Petitioner filed an application under Order 7, Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of plaint being barred by law inter alia on the ground that petitioner was mentally infirm and was undergoing treatment in the Department of Psychiatry, IGMC, Shimla, yet, plaintiffs sued him in his independent capacity, without institu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top