IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
Krishna @ Kiran - Appellant
Versus
State Of H P - Respondent
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (Main) No. 175 of 2020
Decided On : 05-06-2020
Section 167 of the Criminal Procedure Code - Quashing of FIR - Mis-conceived petition
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to quash the Supplementary Charge Sheet in FIR No. 29 of 2019 u/s 29 NDPS Act and 201 IPC, on the grounds that the charge sheet was not filed within 180 days as mandated by Section 167 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petition was mis-conceived as Section 167 of the Criminal Procedure Code does not mandate the quashing of FIR if the investigation is not completed within 180 days and the investigation report is not filed by the police before the appropriate Court.
Issues: The main issue was whether the FIR should be quashed due to the failure of the police to file the investigation report within 180 days as per Section 167 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 167 of the Criminal Procedure Code and concluded that it does not provide for the quashing of FIR if the investigation is not completed within 180 days.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, stating that it was completely mis-conceived.
JUDGMENT
Ajay Mohan Goel, J. - By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief:-
"It is, therefore, most respectfully and humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Supplementary Charge Sheet in FIR No. 29 of 2019 u/s 29 NDPS Act and 201 IPC, registered with P.S. Shimla Sadar; and/or
any other order/orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also be passed in favour of the petitioner herein, looking into the background and facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity."
2. Mr. Nitin Bansal, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner has stated that FIR in issue warrants quashing for the reason that after the registration of the said FIR, charge sheet has not been filed in the Court by the police within 180 days, as is the mandate of the provisions of Section 167 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. He insists that on account of said failure of the police, the FIR mandatorily has to be quashed by allowing this petition. No other point was urged.
3. Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Advocate General, in my considered view, this petition is completely mis-conceived. Section 167 of the Criminal Procedure Code envisages the procedure which has to be followed when investigation cannot be completed within the time period stipulated in Sub Sections thereof. It describes that if investigation is not completed within the time period stipulated therein, then what consequences shall ensue. It is nowhere provided in Section 167 of the Criminal Procedure Code that in case investigation is not completed within 180 days and investigation report is not filed by the police before the appropriate Court, then the FIR has to be quashed and this shall also be one of the consequence.
4. In this background, without commenting any further on the merit of the case, as this Court is convinced that filing of this petition is completely mis-conceived, the same is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.