SANDEEP SHARMA
Sudhanshu Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
1. Bail petitioners namely Sudhanshu Kapoor, Nishtha Kapoor Nivedita Banshtu and Col. Kuldeep Singh Banshtu, have approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under S.438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail in Case FIR No. 86, dated 11.6.2020, under Ss. 306 and 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Rampur, District Shimla, Himachal Pradesh.
2. Sequel to orders dated 16.6.2020 and 30.6.2020, respondent State has filed status report prepared on the basis of investigation carried out by investigating agency, perusal whereof reveals that on 11.6.2020, complainant, Prem Nath Sharma, who happens to be the father of the deceased, Divya Kapoor, lodged a complaint with Dy. S.P. Rampur alleging therein that his daughter (deceased) has committed suicide on 9.6.2020 at 7.30 pm, after being instigated by her in-laws. Complainant also disclosed to the Police that on the date of alleged incident, deceased had uploaded a note in the afternoon, perusal whereof reveals that she was being constantly harassed and tortured by her in-laws, as a consequence of which, she took drastic step of finishing her life by committing suicide. It emerges from the record made a
Adri Dharan Das vs. State of West Bengal
D.K. Ganesh Babu vs. P.T. Manokaran
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia vs. State of Punjab
Jai Prakash Singh vs. State of Bihar and Another
P. Chidambaram vs. Directorate of Enforcement
Sanjay Candra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.