SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(HP) 1126

NARINDER CHAUHAN
Bhima Nand – Appellant
Versus
Krishna Nand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri Abhishek Sood, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Shri Krishna Nand, Advocate, for the Respondent in Person

ORDER

Shri Narinder Chauhan, I.A.S., Financial Commissioner (Appeals). —This revision petition has been preferred under section 17 of the H.P.Land Revenue Act 1954, (herein after referred to as ''the Act''), against the order dated 26.9.2014, passed by the Id. Commissioner, Shimla Division, in Case No. 78/2011, whereby the Id. Commissions has dismissed the revision petition of the present petitioner by upholding the orders passed by the courts below.

2. Brief facts of the case are that Shri Krishna Nand, herein respondent filed an application under section 123 of the Act, before the A.C. 1st Grade, Kandaghat or 12.9.2007, for separation of his share in the land comprised in khata/khatauni no. 42'' 89, total kita 73, area measuring 117-02 bighas, situated in Mauza Chhausha, Pargna Bharooli, Tehsil Kandaghat, Distt. Solan, H.P., as per jamabandi for the year 1999-2000 After hearing both the parties, the A.C. 1st Grade, vide order dated 16.5.2008, devised a mode of partition, which was assailed by the present petitioner before the Id. Collector, Sub-Division, Kandaghat, who, vide order dated 30.12.2008, passed in case No. 15.8.2008, allowed the appeal and set aside the above order of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top