JUDGMENT

Sanjay Karol, A. C. J. - M/S EIH Associated Hotels Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the landlord) and Mrs. Neema Bakshi (hereinafter referred to as the tenant) have filed the instant petitions, under the provisions of Section 24(5) of the H. P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).

2. The landlord is the owner of demised premises, i. e. Flats No. 229, 230, 231, 232 and Quarter No. 12 of Block No. 8 of the Cecil Hotel State, Chaura Maidan, Shimla. Undoubtely, the said premises were let out to the tenant.

3. Both the landlord and the tenant are aggrieved of order dated 6. 7. 2017, passed by the Appellate Authority-II, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, in Rent Applications No. 98-S/6 of 2017 & 107-S/6 of 2017 (in Rent Appeal No. 9-S/13(b) of 2017), subject matter of challenge in the present proceedings, whereby the tenant stands directed to deposit a sum of Rs. 24,000/- per month as use and occupation charges, w. e. f. 31. 3. 2017.

4. Before this Court, the parties have amicably resolved their dispute. The tenant has agreed to hand over the entire rented accommodation, consisting of six rooms, three bath rooms, one kitchen in Cecil Hotel Annexe; one Servan