SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(HP) 1038

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Sansar Chand – Appellant
Versus
Bidhi Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Chaudhary, Sandeep Chauhan, Advocates for the appearing parties.

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J —During the pendency of Civil suit No. 93 of 2017, the plaintiff had cast an application, under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC, before the learned trial Judge, seeking therein relief of ad-interim injunction, vis--vis the suit property. The learned trial Judge, had directed the parties, to maintain status quo, vis--vis the nature and possession, of, the suit Khasra, bearing No. 289. Being aggrieved therefrom, the defendants preferred an appeal, before, the learned first appellate Court. The latter Court, while affirming, the orders recorded by the learned trial Judge, had reversed the findings of the learned trial Judge. The plaintiff is aggrieved, hence has instituted the instant petition.

2. This Court had on, 13.4.2018, upon CMP NO. 3141 of 2018, hence made a pronouncement, upon the contesting parties, maintaining status quo, qua the nature, and, possession of the suit land. However, as apparent, on a reading of the apt reply, occurring in paragraph -2 thereof, contents whereof are supported by an affidavit, qua prior to the defendant, being served with a copy of the orders, recorded on the aforesaid date, his rather completing construction, upon Khasra No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top