SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(HP) 1591

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sanjay Karol, A.C.J.
Hira Singh - Appellant
Versus
Devinder Sharma & Anr. - Respondents
Criminal Revision No. 254 of 2017
Decided On : 12-01-2018

Advocates Appeared:
Dewakar Dev Sharma, M.A Khan, R.S Verma, Rohit Chauhan, Advocates for the appearing parties.

The court emphasized the significance of mediation and the compounding of the offence in reaching an amicable resolution, in line with the legal principle established by the Apex Court.

Headnote:

Negotiable Instruments Act - Compounding of Offence - Mediation and amicable resolution of dispute based on the ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court

Fact of the Case:

The accused-petitioner was convicted and sentenced for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The matter was sent for mediation, resulting in an amicable resolution of the dispute.

Finding of the Court:

The court appreciated the efforts of the parties' counsel and the mediator in achieving a positive outcome through mediation. The respondent had already received the compensation, and the petitioner was directed to deposit 15% of the cheque amount before the State Legal Services Authority. The offence was directed to be compounded, and the judgments of conviction and sentence were set aside.

Issues: Conviction and sentencing under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, mediation and compounding of the offence

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the amicable resolution of the dispute through mediation, the receipt of compensation by the respondent, and the application of the legal principle laid down by the Apex Court in Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H.

Final Decision: The present petition was disposed of, and the judgments of conviction and sentence passed by the lower courts were set aside.

JUDGMENT

Sanjay Karol, A.C.J —Assailing the judgment dated 3.8.2016/5.8.2016, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Court No. 5, Shimla, H.P. in Complaint No. 255/3 of 2015, titled as Sh. Devinder Sharma vs. Sh. Hira Singh, as affirmed by the learned Sessions Judge, Shimla, H.P., vide judgment dated 29.5.2017, passed in Criminal Appeal No. 51-S/10 of 2016, titled as Hira Singh vs. Devinder Sharma, the convictpetitioner has filed the present Revision Petition under the provisions of Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. It is seen that the Trial Court has convicted the accused-petitioner and sentenced him to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and pay compensation of Rs.1, 40, 000/- to the complainant, in relation to offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The judgment of conviction and sentence has been upheld by the learned Sessions Judge, Shimla.

3. On 13.10.2017 the matter was sent for mediation. It is heartening to note that the proceedings of mediation have fructified into positive outcome. This could have been possible only with the intervention of the learned counsel for the parties and the efforts put in by Mr. S.C. Sharma, learned Counsel who was requested by the Court to mediate between the parties. Efforts put in by learned counsel for the parties and more particularly Mr. S. C. Sharma, learned Mediator are highly appreciated. Report of the learned Mediator is taken on record. Parties have amicably resolved their dispute in view of the ratio of law laid down by the Apex Court in Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H. , (2010) 5 SCC 663.

4. Needless to add, respondent No. 1 has already received the entire amount of compensation from the petitioner and it shall be open for him to withdraw the amount deposited by the petitioner herein before the Court below. Mr. Dewakar Dev Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner states that 15% of the cheque amount in terms of Damodar Prabhu shall be deposited before the H.P. State Legal Services Authority, Shimla, H.P., within a period of four weeks from today.

5. As such, offence is directed to be compounded and the judgments of conviction and sentence passed by the Courts below are set aside.

    With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of, so also the pending applications, if any.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top