JUDGMENT

Ajay Mohan Goel, J. - By way of this writ petition, State has challenged order, dated 05.10.2015, passed by the learned Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 584 of 2015, titled as Arjun Singh Vs. State of H.P. and others, which reads as under:

"The applicant had been daily wage beldar with the respondents. The respondents in their response admit that the applicant had completed 240 days of presence in each calendar year from 1995 to 2002. The daily wage workers, who have completed 8 years service are to be regularized. The respondents further admit that the applicant was regularized with effect from 21.9.2007. Such status ought to have been conferred cfter completion of 8 years, that is, with effect from 1.1.2003. As such, the original application is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to issue appropriate orders of regularization of the applicant with effect from 1.1.2003.

2. The pending misc. application, if any, also stands disposed of. "

2. Learned Advocate General has argued that the impugned order is not sustainable in the eyes of law, as while passing the impugned directions, learned Administrative Tribunal has erred in not appreciating that upon completio