SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(HP) 1493

SANDEEP SHARMA
Lekh Raj – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Chand – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Singh Chandel, Adv., K.D. Sood, Adv., Sanjeev Sood, Adv.

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Sharma, J. - Being aggrieved and dis-satisfied with order dated 7.4.2018, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Court No IV, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H.P. in CMA No. 341/2017 in CS No. 70/2012, whereby an application under Order 7 Rule 14 (3) of CPC, seeking therein permission to attach certain documents in the plaint, came to be rejected, petitioner-plaintiff has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying therein to setaside impugned order.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record vis--vis reasoning assigned by the court below in the impugned order, this Court sees no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the court below, rather this Court finds from the record that prior to passing of the impugned order, plaintiff had filed similar application, which was registered as CMA No. 408/2016 in CS No.70 of 2012, under Order 7 Rule 14(3) CPC, however, same was dismissed vide order dated 31.5.2017, with costs of Rs. 1,000/-

3. Careful perusal of order dated 31.5.2017, clearly suggests that no cogent and convincing reason was adduced on re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top