P.S.RANA, VIJAY PAL KHACHI, MEENA VERMA
Autopace Networks Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Anita Kumari – Respondent
ORDER
P.S. Rana (R), President. - Present appeal is filed against order dated 21.08.2015 passed by Learned District Forum in consumer complaint No. 159/2012 title Smt. Anita Kumari vs. Managing Director M/s. Auto Pace Network Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Brief facts of Case:
2. Complainant Smt. Anita Kumari filed consumer complaint under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 against opposite parties pleaded therein that complainant is unemployed married lady. It is pleaded that opposite party No. 1 is authorized dealer of Maruti Suzuki and conducting business of selling second hand cars in the name and style of Maruti True Value. It is further pleaded that opposite party No. 2 is regional head of Maruti Company and opposite party No. 3 is head of entire company. It is pleaded that opposite party No. 4 is local branch of Maruti Company engaged in selling cars and earning profits. It is further pleaded that complainant purchased car No. UP-12J-8151 Maruti 800 in consideration amount of Rs. 70000/- (Seventy thousand). It is further pleaded that documents of car were not supplied to complainant. It is further pleaded that car could not be plied upon public road due to non-supply of relevant d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.