SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(HP) 1699

SANDEEP SHARMA
Monika Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Kuldeep Kumar Dogra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Nitin Thakur, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Sandeep Sharma, J. (oral) - Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with order dated 24.1.2018, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur, H. P., whereby an application filed under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short "the Act") for grant of maintenance pendent-lite, came to be dismissed, applicant/petitioner (herein after referred to as the applicant), has approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying therein to set-aside aforesaid impugned order and to allow the application filed under Section 24 of the Act.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record vis--vis impugned order passed by the learned court below, this Court finds that marriage inter-se applicant and respondent stands dissolved by way of decree dated 1. 11.2012, which has been affirmed by this Court vide judgment dated 31.7.2015 (Annexure P-7).

3. Learned counsel for the applicant fairly acknowledged that aforesaid judgment of this Court affirming decree passed by the court below dissolving the marriage inter-se parties has attained finality because no ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top