DHARAM CHAND CHAUDHARY
Ajay Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dharam Chand Chaudhary, J. (Oral) - Accused-Petitioner Smt. Sapna Devi alias Swadesh Rani is not present due to she delivered a baby recently two months back. Accused-Petitioner No. 1 and 3 are, however, present in person. The complainant-respondent No. 2 Seema Kumari is present in person. As a matter of fact it is at her instance a case under Section 498-A read with Section 34 IPC has been registered in Police Station, Kangra district Kangra H.P. vide FIR Annexure P-4 against the Accused-Petitioners. Now the police has filed the challan in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kangra which has been registered as case No. 154-II of 2014, titled State vs. Ajay Kumar and others. The complainant-respondent No. 2 and Accused-Petitioners have now patched-up all differences amongst them and arrived at compromise during the course of proceedings in the pending criminal case in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kangra. The terms and conditions of the compromise Annexure P-5 are reflected in the order dated 25.6.2016 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.
2. As a matter of fact, learned trial Court has made an endeavour
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.