Krishan Dutt Premi vs State Of H. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 Supreme(HP) 1302

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Krishan Dutt Premi – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. S.R. Pandiyar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Vivek Singh Attri, Addl. A.G, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J. - The instant Appeal stands directed against the judgment rendered on 23.10.2008/30.10.2008 by the learned Special Judge, Kullu, H.P. in Sessions trial No. 45 of 2006, whereby, the learned trial Court acquitted the Accused/appellant herein, for his committing an offence punishable under Section 3 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, however, he convicted the Accused/appellant herein for his committing offences punishable under Sections 354 and 509 of the IPC and sentenced him as under:-

Sections	Imprisonment imposed
354, IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo further imprisonment for a period of one month.
509, IPC	To undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/- and in default of payment of fine amount to undergo further imprisonment for a period of one month.

All the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that Accused, who wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 Supreme(HP) 1302

SURESHWAR THAKURKrishan Dutt Premi – AppellantVersusState Of H. P. – Respondent

SURESHWAR THAKUR
Krishan Dutt Premi – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent