TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, JYOTSNA REWAL DUA
Sajid – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J. - The District Magistrate, Baghpat (U.P.), did not recommend release of the petitioner on parole, hence, the respondents rejected his case as such.
2. Learned Special Judge-II, Mandi, Distrit Mandi (H.P.), vide judgment dated 16.01.2014, passed in Trial No.23 of 2012, convicted the petitioner for the offence punishable under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. He was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.1,00,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he has to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year.
Criminal Appeal No.26/2014, preferred by the petitioner against the aforesaid judgment was dismissed by this Court on 09.05.2016. SLP (Criminal) Diary No.266/2018, preferred by the petitioner also stands dismissed by Hon'ble Apex Court on 25.01.2018.
3. Ever since 2014, all applications of the petitioner seeking parole have been rejected by the respondents on the basis of non-recommendation by the District Magistrate, Baghpat (U.P.). Last application seeking release on parole was moved by him on 01.08.2018. It also met the same fate as the District Magistrate did not
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.