ANOOP CHITKARA
Ravinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The Accused, after compromising the entire matter with the injured, has come up before this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C, by invoking inherent powers, seeking quashing of FIR No.47/2018 dated 10.4.2018, under Sections 498-A, 406 read with 34 of IPC, in the file of Police Station, Barsar, District Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, and all subsequent proceedings.
2. The present F.I.R. stands registered on the basis of information given by Smt. Shanvli Sharma, who has been arrayed as respondent No.2 in the present petition, and Mr. Sunny Dhatwalia, Advocate duly represents her.
3. FACTS: The gist of the entire case is as follows:
a) The present FIR was registered on the basis of information given by Smt. Shanvli Sharma, complainant. She stated that her marriage was solemnized with accused Ravinder Kumar on 10.2.2015 as Hindu custom. After the marriage, for some time everything was going smoothly, but after some time, the relation between her and her husband became stringent. After 10-15 days of the marriage, when her husband was going back to join his duties, he told her that her parents have not given him car. On this, she told him that her parents have give
Ashok Chaturvedi and others vs. Shltul H. Chanchanl and another
Kunstocom Electronics (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Gilt Pack Ltd. and another
R.P. Kapur vs. State of Punjab
Madhavrao Jiwaji Rao Scindia vs. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Ors. vs. State of Gujarat & anr.
Preeti Gupta vs. State of Jharkhand
Geeta Mehrotra vs. State of U.P.
Manoj Kumar Sharma vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.