SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(HP) 631

SURESHWAR THAKUR, CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Daleep Chandel, Advocate, V.D. Khidtta, Advocate, Hemant Vaid, Advocate, Ashwani Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J. - Through, the, extant writ petition, the writ petitioner, claims, benefit of conferment, of, status, of, regularization, against the post, Daftri/Peon/Chowkidar, Class-IV employee, upon, him, imperatively, upon his completing, hence, within the ambit, of, the relevant policy, rather 5/7 years of continuous service thereagainst.

2. Since, the afore endeavour of the petitioner, becomes, averred in the petition, to, beget failure, despite his repeated requests being made upon the respondents, hence, through the extant petition, he seeks issuance, of, an apposite writ, of, mandamus, upon, the respondents.

3. However, the respondents seriously contest(s), the afore strivings, of, a mandamus, being made upon them, and, the afore contest is hinged, upon, the factum of the petitioner, being not, on the muster rolls, of, the government, nor his drawing money from the government treasury, rather his drawing moneys/remunerations, from, the amalgamated funds, hence collected from the students.

4. The petitioner, through, filing rejoinder thereto, denied the afore factum, hence, has been, therethrough(s), able to de-establish the afore contention reared by the res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top