SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(HP) 726

SANDEEP SHARMA
Prem Lal – Appellant
Versus
Amar Chand – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Navlesh Verma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Sharma, J.

Being aggrieved and dis-satisfied with judgment dated 26.12.2019, passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sundernagar, District Mandi in CMA No. 36/2019, whereby order dated 25.11.2019, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Court No.2, Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. in CMA No. 474 of 2019 in CS No. 207 of 2019 came to be set aside, petitioners-plaintiffs (in short the "plaintiffs") have approached this Court in the instant proceedings filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying therein to set-aside aforesaid impugned order.

2. Precisely, the facts of the case as emerge from the record are that the plaintiffs filed civil suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondent-defendant (herein after referred to as "the defendant") stating therein that land comprising khewat No. 6, Khatauni No.6, Khasra Nos. 83, 607, 1322, 1324, 1325, 2092/860, 2092, 294, kitas 7, total land measuring 19-08-15 bigha and khweat No.6, Khatuni No. 7, Khasrsa Nos. 1320 and 1321 kitas 2, land measuring 00-04-10 bighas situate in Muhal Jarol/94 Tehsil Sundernagar, District Mandi, H.P. (in short "the suit land") is jointly recorded in the owner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top