JUDGMENT :

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The writ petitioner's land, is, evidently utilized by the respondents for the construction of road, nomenclatured, as, Bdiyara-Manghara road. However, despite the respondents utilizing the land of the writ petitioner for construction of the afore road, no compensation became determined, vis-a-vis, the petitioner's land, hence, leading the writ petitioner to approach this Court. Through, the extant writ petition, the petitioner claims rendition of a mandamus, upon, the respondents for acquiring his utilised land, and, thereafter the respondents determining compensation qua his land.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has, contended that since, vis-a-vis, the land of one Dina Nath located also hence within the span of the afore nomenclatured road, became after, a conclusive judgement and decree becoming rendered by the court concerned, hence, recommended, for, determination, of, compensation by the Negotiation Committed in its meeting held on 26th October, 2016, recommendations whereof, are borne in Annexure P-5, (i) and, whereafter the respondents meted approval, vis-a-vis, the recommendations as borne in Annexure P-5, (ii) thereupon