SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(HP) 41

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, JJ.
Akhtar Hussain & Anr - Petitioners
Versus
H. P. State Commission & Ors - Respondents
CWP No. 6427 of 2020
Decided on : 02-01-2021

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Vishwa Bhushan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Ajit Saklani, Advocate, Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Ms.
Seema Sharma and Mr. Yudhvir Singh Thakur, Dy. A.Gs.

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - H.P. Panchayati Raj - Sub-section (1) and sub-section (1A) of Section 20 - Extraordinary circumstance warranting - Reside - Whether person was ordinarily residing in a particular constituency - It is well settled proposition of law inclusion or exclusion of name in Voter List cannot be termed as an extraordinary circumstance warranting interference of High Court in exercise - Extraordinary and exceptional circumstances - High Court can entertain writ petition under Article 226 of Constitution where order is ultra vires or nullity and/or ex facie without jurisdiction - extraordinary circumstance warranting interference by Court under Article 226 of Constitution and such question at best are to be decided in election petition – Held, Election process has already begun and final voter list has also been published entertaining this petition stage would amount to obstructing the election process, is not permissible - Settled Court in exercise of its writ jurisdiction can interfere in matters relating to election only if it subserves progress of election and facilitates completion thereof - Present petition filed after commencement of election process with a view to stall election cannot be entertained - When petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy of filing an election petition under Rules – Petition is dismissed

JUDGMENT :

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, J.

1. Aggrieved by the non-inclusion of their names in the Voter List, the petitioners have filed the instant petition for the grant of following substantive reliefs:-

    (i) That the respondents be directed to revise the electoral roll of the gram panchayat Daand under Development Block Salooni and the names of the petitioner be included in the voter list of the gram panchayat Daand under Development Block Salooni Chamba and the nomination of the petitioner for contesting panchayat election may also be ordered to be accepted.

(ii) That impugned orders if any passed by the respondent which has not been supplied to the petitioners be also quashed and set aside being in violation of the H.P. Panchayati Raj (Election) Rules.

2. It is well settled proposition of law that inclusion or exclusion of name in the Voter List cannot be termed as an extraordinary circumstance warranting interference of the High Court in exercise of the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. However, it is always open to a person whose name is not included in the Voter List to avail the benefit by filing election petition as the authorities constituted have wide powers to cancel, confirm and amend the election and it can also direct to hold fresh election, in case, the election is eventually set aside.

3. No doubt, in extraordinary and exceptional circumstances, the High Court can entertain writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution where the order is ultra vires or nullity and/or ex facie without jurisdiction. The exclusion or inclusion of name in the Voter List cannot be termed as extraordinary circumstance warranting interference by the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution and such question at best are to be decided in election petition.

4. In addition to the above, a specific and time bound remedy is provided to an aggrieved person under Rule 24 of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj (Elections) Rules, 1994, when a person name is not included in the electoral roll.

5. Rule 24 of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj (Elections) Rules, 1994, reads as under:-

    24. Inclusion of names in the electoral roll, finally published.- (1) Any person, whose name is not included in the electoral roll shall make an application, in Form-2 (in duplicate), to the District Election Officer (Panchayats) for inclusion of his name in that electoral roll, and such application shall be accompanied by a fee of rupees two to be paid in cash against receipt.

(2) District Election Officer (Panchayats) shall immediately on receipt of application under sub-rule (1) direct that one copy thereof be pasted in some conspicuous place in his office together with a notice inviting objections to such application within a period of four days from the date of such pasting.

(3) The District Election Officer (Panchayats) shall as may be, after the expiry of the period specified in the notice under sub-rule (2), consider the objections, if any, received by him and shall, if satisfied that the applicants entitled to be registered in the electoral roll, direct such name to be included therein within a period of 3 days:

Provided that if the applicant whose name is ordered to be included is already registered in the electoral roll of any other constituency of the same Gram Sabha or another Gram Sabha or a Municipality, such a name shall be deleted from that electoral roll:

Provided further that an application under this rule at any time after publication of the election programme under rule 32 shall be made to the District Election Officer (Panchayats) not later than 9 days before the last date fixed for the filing of nomination papers:

Provided further that no amendment or transposition or deletion of any entry shall be made on or after the last date for making nomination till the election process is over.

(4) Where an application made under sub-rule (1), is rejected, an appeal shall be within a period of ten days from the date of rejection of the applicat

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top